1
Quota versus Quality? Long-Term Gains from an Unusual Gender Quota
配额与质量?一项非常规性别配额的长期收益
I21, I23, I28, J16, J24, J45
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20230376 ↗摘要 Abstract
We evaluate equity-efficiency trade-offs from admissions quotas by examining effects on output once beneficiaries start producing in the relevant industry. We estimate the impact of abolishing a 40 percent quota for male primary school teachers on their pupils’ long-run outcomes. We combine this reform with the timing of union-bargained teacher retirements to isolate quasi-random variation in male quota teachers. Pupils exposed to male quota teachers transition more smoothly to postcompulsory education and have higher educational attainment and labor force attachment at age 25. Evidence suggests the quota improved the allocation of talent by mending imperfections in the unconstrained selection process. (JEL I21, I23, I28, J16, J24, J45)
本文通过考察配额受益者进入相关行业产出后的效果,评估录取配额中的公平-效率权衡。我们估计了一项取消小学男教师 40% 配额的政策改革对学生长期结果的影响。我们将该改革与工会协商的教师退休时间相结合,以分离出男性配额教师的准随机变动。接触过男性配额教师的学生更顺利地过渡到义务教育后阶段,且在 25 岁时具有更高的教育成就和劳动力市场参与度。证据表明,该配额通过弥补非约束性选拔过程中的缺陷,改善了人才配置。